Comment from Beatrice Jaquay, please see attached file.
Filed by Gail Fallar Town Clerk due to technical difficulty.
Filed
07/18/2025
Martone, Christopher & Amy [PUBCOMRO]
Please see our attached letter to the Public Utilities Commission regarding Case Number 25-0316-AN.
Filed
07/17/2025
Jaquay, Nelson [PUBCOMRO]
Letter from Nelson Jaquay, adjoining landowner having difficulty posting his comment.
Please attached.
Filed by Gail Fallar, Town Clerk
Filed
07/09/2025
johnson, sherryl [PUBCOM]
see attached file
Filed
07/01/2025
Mackey, Michael Lynn [PUBCOMRO]
My property is located approximately 1,400 feet from proposed tower. I have lived in this house, which I built in 1975. I am very concerned about health issues. At the meeting on 6/19, with ITW ,there were many questions by residents and very few answers from ITW.
Again, I am concerned about health issues and not much benefit for the town or other adjoining landowners.
Filed
07/01/2025
Fallar, Gail [PUBCOM]
As Town Clerk I am submitting this on behalf of a town resident. Please see attached.
Filed
07/01/2025
Fallar, Gail [PUBCOM]
As Town Clerk I am submitting this comment for a Tinmouth resident. Please see attached.
Filed
06/30/2025
Town of Tinmouth [PUBCOMRO]
Fallar, Gail [PUBCOMREP]
See attached file
Filed
06/27/2025
Riley, Meaghan [PUBCOMRO]
I am writing about the tower in Tinmouth. People are worried about their health, their views, the ugliness of a tower, the disruption of the natural beauty of Tinmouth. I feel we’re being taken advantage of because we’re small. Michael, the attorney for VT of public service said that cell phone companies likely wouldn’t want to put the money into a tower in a town with such a small population, then the tower people said the opposite.We have wifi, we don’t need this. Leave Tinmouth alone please
Filed
06/27/2025
Holler, John Carl [PUBCOM]
The proposed tower of unknown/secret purpose($$) directly flies in the face of everything Tinmouth has carefully planned for our town as is evidenced by our town plan. It's ugly domineering metal structure would be completely out of character with our beautiful rural valley which we have had to protect and defend throughout the years from those $eeking to make money at our expense. It serves no public good,we do not need it or want it. Sited next to our historical cemetery is a slap in our face
Filed
06/27/2025
Bucceri, Shirley [PUBCOMRO]
From what I understand this tower will benefit no local residents. If this tower, if built, no longer is being used is there a plan for removing and a very large endowment in a financial institution to cover the cost? Also, the proposed tower is available for cell phone companies - since fiber optics is available in this town which provides great wi-fi, why would a cell company be interested in this investment or is this just a "selling" point for the company hoping to build. Not wanted here
Filed
06/24/2025
Dennis, Todd E [PUBCOM]
This project has not been adequately visually projected as was told to the residents of Tinmouth via a balloon float, is on the edge of protected lands and is not congruent with the rural nature of our community. This project should not go forward without ITW addressing the concerns of the residents of Tinmouth and the Rutland Regional Planning Commission.
