Vermont Public Utility Commission

24-3359-INV Investigation of the standard-offer contract between Vermont Renewable Gas, LLC and the Standard Offer Facilitator Open Case Age: 582
Regulatory / Investigation: Open Date filed: 11/5/24
Hearing Officer  
Electric
   

Public Comments-Portal

Filed Commenter Comment Filed/Ack View Document
  Investigation
    08/12/2025 Porter, Pike [PUBCOM]
An ANR commissioned study advises that in 25 years Vermont forests will be net emitters of CO2 as a result of losing about 4,000 acres for forest annually. In its decision, I ask the commission to address the question of if wood is a resource being consumed at a harvest rate at or below its natural regeneration rate. I also ask that it explain how the methane produced is derived from ag. operations when, absent the proposed bio-plant, no methane is produced by, for example, trimming apple trees Filed
    08/12/2025 Porter, Pike [PUBCOM]
8005: Plants using methane derived from an agricultural operation. It clearly does NOt read "methane derived from feedstock derived from agricultural operation." Proposed decision: --that woody biomass is an eligible feedstock derived from an agricultural operation. The proposed decision reads the statute incorrectly to the detriment for electric rate-payers who will pay extra to subsidize this biomass plant. The commission needs to recognize the clear, unambiguous reading of the statute. Filed
    06/23/2025 Partnership for Policy Integrity [PUBCOM]
      Haight, Laura [PUBCOMREP]
see attached file Filed
    02/14/2025 Partnership for Policy Integrity [PUBCOM]
      Haight, Laura [PUBCOMREP]
See attached file Acknowledged
    02/12/2025 sinclair, peter [PUBCOM]
see attached file Filed
    01/24/2025 Porter, Pike [PUBCOM]
Please see attached comments. Please also read and acknowledge this and previous comments. Filed
    01/23/2025 Smolker, Ph.D., Rachel [PUBCOM]
See attached comment Acknowledged
    01/07/2025 Porter, Pike [PUBCOM]
Commission Rule 2.207(C) states, “Absent extraordinary circumstances, any motion to extend a deadline must be filed at least 3 days before the deadline and must set forth good cause why the extension should be granted.” Filed
    12/16/2024 Porter, Pike [PUBCOM]
No explanation why the petitioner can ignore established PUC filing rules in this case but not in 23-0249-PET. Looks like the books are cooked in this case. Filed
    11/21/2024 Porter, Pike [PUBCOM]
Please see that attached documents providing reasons that motion for extension must be denied Filed
    11/07/2024 Porter, Pike [PUBCOM]
Please see attached file for comments Acknowledged
 
Print this Page